Scientific study reveals ''conspiracy theorists'' the most sane of all Read more: Scientific study reveals ''conspiracy theorists'' the most sane of all | Criticalunity.org

(NaturalNews) If you're a conspiracy theorist, then you're crazy, right? That's been the common belief for years, but recent studies prove that just the opposite is true. Researchers -- psychologists and social scientists, mostly -- in the U.S. and United Kingdom say data indicate that, contrary to those mainstream media stereotypes, "conspiracy theorists" appear to be more sane than people who accept official versions of controversial and contested events. The most recent study was published in July 2013 by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent in the UK. Entitled "'What about Building 7?' A Social Psychological Study of Online Discussion of 9/11 Conspiracy Theories," the study compared "conspiracist," or pro-conspiracy theory, and "conventionalist," or anti-conspiracy, comments on news websites. The researchers noted that they were surprised to find that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventional ones. "Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist," the researchers wrote. 'The research showed that people who favored the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile' Read more: Scientific study reveals ''conspiracy theorists'' the most sane of all | Criticalunity.org http://criticalunity.org/spirituality/1657-scientific-study-reveals-conspiracy-theorists-the-most-sane-of-all#ixzz3Ih8JtYea

NGO ENVISAGES GLOBAL ONE CHILD POLICY, PANDEMICS TO SOLVE OVERPOPULATION Read more: NGO ENVISAGES GLOBAL ONE CHILD POLICY, PANDEMICS TO SOLVE OVERPOPULATION | Criticalunity.org

The National Academy of Sciences has published a shocking report which envisages a Chinese-style global one child policy as the only means of reversing climate change and reducing global population to a “sustainable” number of 1-2 billion people. The white paper, entitled Human population reduction is not a quick fix for environmental problems and authored by the University of Adelaide’s Corey Bradshaw and Barry Brook, even entertains the impact of world wars and global pandemics that wipe out 6 billion people as potential methods of combating the threat posed to the environment by overpopulation. Crucially, the paper is edited by Stanford University’s Paul R. Ehrlich, a perennial advocate of population reduction whose dire proclamations about environmental catastrophes as a result of overpopulation have been proven wildly inaccurate time and time again. In his 1968 book The Population Bomb, Ehrlich infamously predicted that, “In the 1970s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death,” as a result of overpopulation, just one of many ludicrous forecasts that Ehrlich has got spectacularly wrong on a routine basis. Ehrlich has also expressed his support for mandatory population control, arguing that such methods must be imposed “by compulsion if voluntary methods fail,” while the biologist co-authored Ecoscience with White House Science Czar John P. Holdren, the textbook that advocates putting drugs in the water supply to sterilize people, mandatory forced abortions, and a tyrannical eco-fascist dictatorship run by a “planetary regime.” Read more: NGO ENVISAGES GLOBAL ONE CHILD POLICY, PANDEMICS TO SOLVE OVERPOPULATION | Criticalunity.org http://criticalunity.org/news/nwo/population/1671-ngo-envisages-global-one-child-policy-pandemics-to-solve-overpopulation#ixzz3Ih7tn2N7

Have not posted in a while, having to maintain criticalunity.org

Here is a really important article to checkout: "Science isn’t a vote, science is about facts” On the same day that the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change issued a major new global warming report, John Coleman, a founder of the Weather Channel, appeared on CNN Sunday to reiterate his stance that “climate change is not happening.” Describing himself as a “skeptic,” not a denier – “that is a word meant to put me down” – the veteran weather forecaster told CNN’s “Reliable Sources” that the news network was promoting an inaccurate view on the issue. “CNN has taken a very strong position on global warming, that it is a consensus,” he said. “Well, there is no consensus in science. Science isn’t a vote, science is about facts.” Read more: WEATHER CHANNEL FOUNDER: MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING IS ‘BALONEY’ | Criticalunity.org http://criticalunity.org/news/health-environment/1668-weather-channel-founder-man-made-global-warming-is-baloney#ixzz3Ih6B6eXc

YOUR CHALLENGE: SPREAD THE WORD TO AS MANY PEOPLE AS YOU CAN!